Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:44

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Maybe not best, but Sounders are most fitting MLS Club World Cup representative - Sounder at Heart
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Why do people with straight hair think curly hair is so easy to take care of?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
2025 NBA Finals: 4 things to watch for in Game 7 of Finals - NBA
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
This supermassive black hole is eating way too quickly — and 'burping' at near-light speeds - Space